Data center developers are paying premiums for powered land. Get a realistic read on your parcel. Free, no obligation unless a deal closes.

Get a read on your parcel

Last updated: October 7, 2026

NYISO Interconnection Queue for Data Centers, Explained

New York ISO doesn't put data centers in its generator queue. It studies them through a separate load interconnection process, and in 2026 that process is being rebuilt after a FERC show cause order. This guide covers how a New York data center gets studied today, what NYISO has proposed to change, and what a landowner should document before calling a developer.

⚡ TL;DR: NYISO and Data Center Interconnection in 2026

  • • Separate front door: data centers are studied as loads under OATT Section 3.9, not in the generator Cluster Study (Attachment HH)
  • • Current thresholds: loads over 10 MW at 115 kV and above, or 80 MW and up below 115 kV; smaller loads follow the transmission owner's own process
  • • Study: a non-binding System Impact Study, a $150,000 deposit, and a conservative nine-month estimate from NYISO's Technical Bulletin 266
  • • 2026 rebuild: FERC's June 18, 2026 show cause order (EL26-69) pushed NYISO toward a new large-load process it calls BELL, targeted for a November 16, 2026 tariff filing
  • • Proposed definition: a Large Load would be a single site with 50 MW or more of peak load connected above 69 kV

Why "the NYISO queue" means two different things

When people say a project is "in the NYISO queue," they usually mean the generator interconnection queue: solar, wind, storage, and gas plants asking to inject power. NYISO runs that as a two-phase cluster study under Attachment HH of its tariff. In Phase 1 the connecting and affected transmission owners look at local impacts and cost the attachment facilities; in Phase 2 NYISO studies the system-wide upgrades the whole cluster needs. That queue is crowded. NYISO's own March 2026 stakeholder slides said the Transition Cluster carried more than 70 GW of proposed new generation, which is more than double the state's summer peak load.

A data center isn't asking to inject anything. It wants to withdraw power, so it goes through NYISO's load interconnection procedure instead. That distinction matters for land. A parcel's value to a data center buyer depends on how fast a load can be studied and served at a nearby substation, and the size of the generator backlog doesn't tell you that. The two only overlap when a data center plans its own generation, which we cover below. For how interconnection queues work across all the major grid operators, see our general interconnection queue guide.

How NYISO studies a data center load today

NYISO published Technical Bulletin 266 in November 2025 to spell out the current load System Impact Study (SIS) procedure. Here's the sequence it describes, in order.

1. Check whether NYISO is involved at all

The NYISO procedure applies to load interconnections greater than 10 MW at 115 kV or above, or 80 MW or more below 115 kV, including uprates to existing or previously planned loads. A project under those lines goes through the connecting transmission owner (CTO) alone. So a 60 MW campus on a 69 kV line and a 60 MW campus on a 115 kV line can start down different paths.

2. Talk to the transmission owner before filing

NYISO recommends that customers coordinate with the CTO first to agree on a proposed point of interconnection (the substation or line name and its voltage) and a preliminary plan for local upgrades. In New York the transmission owners include Central Hudson, Con Edison, NYSEG, National Grid's Niagara Mohawk, Orange and Rockland, RG&E, and the New York Power Authority, with LIPA's system on Long Island. A complete request needs the interconnection request form and a conceptual one-line drawing that shows the project up to a clearly labeled point of interconnection.

3. Scoping, data, and the deposit

NYISO typically schedules a scoping call within about two weeks of deeming a request complete. Attendees need Critical Energy Infrastructure Information (CEII) access and, where required, the CTO's confidentiality agreement. Before the study is scoped, NYISO asks for the load's category (traditional data center, AI training or inference, crypto mining, and so on), how flexible it is during peak periods, daily and seasonal load profiles, phased in-service dates with MW at each phase, and power flow, dynamics, and short-circuit models. The customer has 30 days to sign the System Impact Study Agreement and must post a $150,000 deposit. NYISO refunds the difference if the study comes in under that amount and bills the overage if it runs over.

4. The study itself

The SIS uses a year-five base case drawn from a recent planning study such as NYISO's Short-Term Assessment of Reliability. Load projects in the same area and timeframe may be bundled into one post-project case so their combined impact is caught. If the study finds adverse reliability impacts, it identifies possible Network Upgrades or project changes, and it can test whether a slower ramp schedule avoids the problem before the site reaches full load. The SIS doesn't give cost or schedule estimates for upgrades. Those come later, in the CTO's facilities study.

5. Timing, and what happens next

NYISO calls nine months from study selection to SIS completion a conservative estimate, and says real timelines vary with how quickly models are validated, the size of any reliability problems, and how complex the upgrades are. The SIS is informational and non-binding. Once it's done and paid for, NYISO's role ends. The customer then does the facilities study and signs a two-party interconnection agreement with the CTO. Affected transmission owners and neighboring systems may also review the results.

Site intake

Have land in New York near a 115 kV or higher substation?

Data center developers are paying premiums for powered land — get a realistic read on your parcel. Free, no obligation unless a deal closes.

Submit it for a confidential data center site review. No obligation.

Your information is reviewed privately. A submission is not a listing, and it does not obligate you unless a deal closes.

The 2026 rebuild: FERC's show cause order and the BELL proposal

On June 18, 2026, FERC issued show cause orders to every FERC-jurisdictional RTO and ISO, and to their transmission owner members, on how large and co-located loads are integrated. New York's proceeding is docket EL26-69. Each grid operator had to show why its tariff is still just and reasonable or propose changes. NYISO filed a resource adequacy report on July 20, 2026. On August 3 it asked FERC to put the proceeding in abeyance so it could build a full Section 205 tariff filing with stakeholders. NYISO's August 13, 2026 presentation laid out the schedule: stakeholder committee votes in mid- to late October and a filing targeted for November 16, 2026.

The proposed replacement is what NYISO calls the BELL process. Based on the August 2026 materials, these are the parts a landowner should know about:

  • A new Large Load definition: a commercial or industrial load at one site, behind one or more points of interconnection, with a peak of 50 MW or more connected above 69 kV. New large loads, changes to existing loads, and changes to proposed large loads would all go through BELL.
  • A rolling application window with money up front: the first study deposit would be due at the application window rather than later. An optional pre-application step with the CTO would help a developer pick between alternative points of interconnection.
  • Resource adequacy screening: NYISO would screen early on whether there's enough generation to serve the new load. Loads that hurt resource adequacy could pair with a generator to fix it. Without a partner, they would have to take Non-Firm Withdrawal Service.
  • Firm versus non-firm service: the study would identify how many MW can be served firm and how many only non-firm. A flexible load could accept non-firm service instead of paying for some network upgrades, but then it couldn't also be paid as a demand response resource for those curtailments.
  • Performance requirements: proposed ride-through, ramp (100 MW per five minutes was under consideration), telemetry, and remote-disconnect requirements, drawing on NERC, ERCOT, and PSEG Long Island large-load work.

None of this is final. NYISO itself labeled the process map "for discussion purposes only," and it dropped a separate "Sizeable Load" category after stakeholder pushback. Check NYISO's current tariff and FERC's docket before you rely on any threshold or timeline here when talking to a buyer.

Co-located and partner generation

The proposal gives a large load two ways to bring its own power. A co-located generator sits behind the same point of interconnection. A partner generator is somewhere else, but it has to be in the same capacity region and has to finish the generator interconnection process, including receiving capacity (CRIS) rights. A co-located generator that won't inject power and doesn't want ERIS or CRIS may be able to skip the Cluster Study. If it wants those rights, it still goes through the Cluster Study like any other generator.

For a landowner, that makes certain features worth more in New York: room for on-site generation, a gas lateral or a site that could support one, and room for battery storage. Our guides to behind-the-meter power and curtailment and demand response explain why a developer might accept non-firm service, and what that does to the land it needs.

What it means for a New York data center site

Voltage at the likely point of interconnection is the first thing to pin down. The current 115 kV line and the proposed 69 kV and 50 MW lines decide whether NYISO studies the project at all. A parcel next to a 115 kV or 230 kV substation will be read very differently from one that can only reach a 34.5 kV distribution feeder. If you know the nearest substation's name and voltage, put it at the top of any pitch. Our land near substations guide covers how buyers look at distance and capacity.

Geography inside the state matters too. New York prices power by zone, and downstate zones run tight and expensive. Our New York data center land page explains why upstate areas near NYPA hydropower, such as St. Lawrence County, the Niagara corridor, and Central New York, are the more realistic large-load targets. The proposed resource adequacy screen could add to that difference, since it asks whether generation is available in the load's capacity region.

Expect the developer to own the studies. The $150,000 deposit, the CEII access, and the PSS®E-level modeling are the developer's job, not yours. What you can do is make the site easy to study: clean title, a boundary survey, documented frontage on or near transmission rights-of-way, and a clear answer on how many acres are usable. The due diligence checklist lists what to gather.

Common mistakes evaluating NYISO-territory land

The most common mistake is pointing to the generator queue as evidence that a site can or can't serve a data center. More than 70 GW of proposed generation in the Transition Cluster says a lot about New York's generation pipeline and very little about whether a 100 MW load can be served at a particular substation. Those are different studies with different owners.

The second mistake is treating a finished System Impact Study as a capacity reservation. NYISO says plainly that the load SIS is informational and non-binding, and that the facilities study can use a different system model and reach different upgrade conclusions. A seller who calls a site "NYISO approved" because a past buyer finished an SIS is overstating it.

The third is assuming 2026 rules will match 2025 rules. If NYISO's Section 205 filing goes in as targeted and FERC accepts it, the size threshold, the deposit timing, and firm versus non-firm service could all change for projects that haven't reached their study yet. Date any statement you make about process, and confirm it with the transmission owner.

NYISO next to its neighbors

New York borders two other grid operators with their own large-load efforts. PJM covers New Jersey and Pennsylvania just to the south and west. ISO-NE covers New England to the east, including Massachusetts. All of them got the same June 2026 FERC show cause orders, so many large-load rules are being rewritten across the Northeast at once. Parcels a few miles apart across a state line may still face different thresholds, deposits, and timelines, so compare the specific process each one would go through.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a data center go through the NYISO generator Cluster Study?

No. A data center is a load, and NYISO studies new loads under a separate load interconnection procedure in Section 3.9 of its Open Access Transmission Tariff. The Cluster Study under Attachment HH is the generator queue. The two meet only when a data center pairs with generation: under NYISO's 2026 large-load proposal, a co-located generator that wants to inject power or hold ERIS/CRIS rights still has to complete the Cluster Study.

Which data center projects fall under NYISO's load interconnection rules?

Under the current procedure, NYISO studies load interconnections greater than 10 MW connecting at 115 kV or above, or 80 MW or more connecting below 115 kV, including uprates to existing loads. Anything smaller goes through the connecting transmission owner's own procedures. NYISO's proposed 2026 BELL process would define a Large Load as a commercial or industrial site with a peak of 50 MW or more connected above 69 kV; that definition was still a proposal as of the August 2026 stakeholder materials.

How long does a NYISO load System Impact Study take and what does it cost?

NYISO's Technical Bulletin 266 (November 2025) gives a conservative estimate of nine months from study selection to SIS completion, and says actual progress varies widely. The customer signs the System Impact Study Agreement within 30 days of receiving it and posts a $150,000 study deposit; actual costs below that are refunded and costs above it are billed. The SIS is informational and non-binding. Facilities studies and the interconnection agreement are then handled with the connecting transmission owner.

What changed for large loads in New York in 2026?

On June 18, 2026, FERC issued show cause orders to every FERC-jurisdictional RTO/ISO and their transmission owners on large and co-located load integration; New York's docket is EL26-69. NYISO filed a resource adequacy report on July 20, 2026, asked FERC on August 3 to hold the proceeding in abeyance, and began developing a Section 205 tariff filing. Its August 2026 schedule targeted stakeholder votes in October and a filing on November 16, 2026. Treat those as targets, not final rules.

Can I submit New York land for data center consideration?

Yes. If you own or represent land in New York near a high-voltage substation or transmission line, submit it through our site intake form for a confidential review. Include the nearest substation name and voltage if you know it, since NYISO's study thresholds turn on the voltage at the point of interconnection. No obligation.

Sources: NYISO Technical Bulletin 266, Load Interconnection Projects System Impact Study Procedure (Nov. 7, 2025); NYISO "Large Load FERC Show Cause Order" presentation to ESPWG/TPAS (Aug. 13, 2026); NYISO "2026 Cluster Study Enhancements" (Mar. 2026); FERC show cause order, Docket EL26-69-000 (June 2026). This page is general information, not legal or engineering advice.

Site intake

Own or represent land in New York?

Data center developers are paying premiums for powered land — get a realistic read on your parcel. Free, no obligation unless a deal closes.

Submit it for a confidential data center site review. No obligation.

Your information is reviewed privately. A submission is not a listing, and it does not obligate you unless a deal closes.

Landowner path

Developers are queuing for power. Own the land under it?

A queue position is not an offer on a parcel. If you own land in a state where the public record shows data-center load or a hyperscale campus, start with the state or county page, then submit.